The Lost Art of Asking for Help

When you have to write "sorry if it's a bit much," it probably is a bit much.

This week I got a follow-up email from a founder who clearly means well. They had asked me to pass along an introduction, and this was their last check-in. It was polite, warm and gracious about the possibility that I'd say no. Then came the line that stopped me: a heads-up that the message was an automated reminder from their AI assistant, with an apology in case it was a bit much.

I'm not writing this to shame anyone. I'm writing it because I felt something shift in me when I read it, and I think it matters for all of us who ask for things, and all of us who get asked.

Asking for something is a relationship moment, not a logistics task

When we ask someone for help, whether it's reviewing our audiobook, making an introduction or giving us twenty minutes of their time, we are doing two things at once. We are requesting a favor, and we are telling that person they matter enough to be asked.

The second part is where the value lives. A good ask says: I thought of you, I trust your judgment, and I'm willing to be a little vulnerable by needing something. The person receiving it gets to feel useful and trusted. Many of the closest working relationships I've had began with someone saying, plainly, "Could you help me with this?"

That exchange is the whole point. It's hard to automate because the awkwardness is the feature. Asking costs us something, and the cost is what makes it mean something.

What the automated nudge says to the person receiving it

To be fair, automated follow-ups have a long and legitimate history in sales and business development. Sequenced emails and scheduled reminders are standard there, and both sides understand the rules. A prospect expects a cadence, and the relationship rests on a commercial exchange.

A personal favor is different. There is no transaction to carry it, only the other person's goodwill and their willingness to spend their time or their credibility on your behalf. The same mechanics that read as professional in a sales pipeline read as impersonal when you're asking a favor.

Here is what I took from that email, whether or not it was intended:

• My request isn't worth your own attention. The follow-up came from a system, not from the person who asked me.
• The relationship is a task in a queue. I was one item on a list, and the reminder fired on schedule.
• The apology is doing the work the effort should have done. "Sorry if it's a bit much" hands me the job of reassuring them about a message they didn't write.

The result is that I'm less inclined to help. Not out of annoyance, but because the thing that makes me want to go out of my way for someone, the sense that this person cares about this and about me, was missing. Introductions spend my credibility with someone else. I'm willing to spend it when I feel the connection, and I'm hesitant when I don't.

There is a larger cost too. If we hand off the moments where people reach toward each other, we lose the practice. Asking is a muscle, and the less we use it, the more uncomfortable it gets.

How to ask well

None of this is complicated. It is just easy to skip when software offers to skip it for you.

1. Make it personal and specific. Say why you're asking this person, and what exactly you're hoping for. "Would you review the audiobook?" is easier to answer than "Would you be open to helping in some way?"
2. Make it easy to say no, and mean it. Give a real way out, once, at the start. Don't repeat the apology in every follow-up.
3. Do the work for them. If you want an introduction, write the blurb they can forward. If you want a review, send the link and the deadline. Lower their effort, not your own.
4. Follow up as yourself, once. A short note in your own words, a few days later, is fine. A sequence of nudges is pressure, whoever or whatever sends it.
5. Close the loop. Say thank you, and tell them what happened. People remember being told their help mattered.

What I'm doing this week

This isn't theory for me. This week I'm asking friends and close contacts for help with our audiobook launch, and I'm writing every email myself. My goal is ten a day, each one personal and in my own words, and I'm tracking my progress in a spreadsheet.

It isn't hard. It takes some time and a willingness to feel a little exposed, which is part of the point. It's also what I did when I raised capital for my company. The spreadsheet keeps me organized, but it doesn't write a word of the message or handle any of the follow ups.

Where AI can help without replacing the ask

I'm not anti-assistant. AI is useful for the thinking around an ask: remembering who you promised to follow up with, drafting a first pass you then rewrite in your own voice, or pressure-testing whether your request is clear and kind.

The line I'd draw is this: let the tool help you prepare, and keep the human moment human. A reminder that tells you to check in is a great use. A message that goes out to someone else, in your name, on a timer, is a different thing. If a note carries your name, you should have read it, shaped it and decided it was worth sending.

A useful test is whether you would be comfortable telling the recipient exactly how the message was made. If the honest answer is "my assistant sent it and I didn't look," the message will probably say so on its own.

Ask like a person

The founder who emailed me this week is not the problem. They're doing what a lot of us are doing: trying to keep up, and reaching for the tools that promise to make it easier.

But the point of asking for help was never efficiency. It's connection. So the next time you need something from someone, write the message yourself, imperfect and a little awkward. Tell them why you thought of them. Make it easy to decline. Then say thank you. That's the version people will want to help with.

• #Leadership
• #WorkplaceCulture
• #Communication